Monday, March 15, 2010

The Rolling Stones 3


THE LAST TIME?

By this point, the Rolling Stones had fallen into an familiar (if undeniably
profi table) pattern: release an album that’s routinely hyped as a return to
form, followed by an epic stadium tour, with both accompanied by intimations
that they might be the band’s last. The fact that the Stones can continue
to reap massive rewards from this strategy every few years is powerful evidence
of their bigger-than-life status as one of rock’s few living legends.

The Rolling Stones 2

ONLY ROCK AND ROLL
The Rolling Stones had made some of their best, most original music in the
late 1960s and early 1970s. But following the ragged tour de force of Exile on
Main St. , the Stones quickly lost focus, resulting in a series of competent but
uninspired releases that maintained the band’s crowd-pleasing sound, while
adding little of substance to their recorded legacy. Many of their post- Exile
albums would be recorded in bits and pieces rather than as concerted creative
efforts, with various band members working in various combinations when
schedules permitted.

The Rolling Stones

ALL BOW TO THEIR SATANIC MAJESTIES
The Rolling Stones may have demonstrated a certain lack of modesty when
they anointed themselves the World’s Greatest Rock and Roll Band in the late
1960s. But the title was no idle boast. In their early days as the British Invasion’s
foremost exponents of bad attitude, the scruffy quintet embodied all
that was dangerous and transgressive about rock and roll. In the decades that followed, they managed to maintain their defi ant aura, even after they became
a stadium-fi lling, profi t-spinning institution.

eXTReMe Tracker

  © Blogger template Brooklyn by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP